The way in which international political economy (IPE) developed in Anglo-Saxon countries set the main standards for its study in other regions of the world, establishing a transatlantic order that separated mainstream IPE from the periphery. This article is part of a debate that seeks to raise awareness of Latin American contributions to IPE. It underlines the connections between thought and political practice, examining how the subfield has developed between 2000 and 2021 by studying works published in the leading journals of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. Three central arguments are discussed. First, the field of IPE in Latin America developed before its conception in the Anglo-Saxon world and separately of mainstream views because distinctive regional problems did not fit well within the frameworks of mainstream approaches. Second, there is a vibrancy in the debate about IPE topics in regional journals, and the intellectual tradition of the 1950s and 1960s is under constant revision. Third, in contrast to the bias in mainstream IR that focuses on policy successes, Latin American IPE has been closely related to the formulation of policies that have often examined adversities in the implementation of policies connected to the different crises the region has faced.

中文翻译：

---

拉丁美洲国际政治经济：跨越大西洋鸿沟的贡献

国际政治经济学（IPE）在盎格鲁-撒克逊国家的发展方式为世界其他地区的国际政治经济学研究设定了主要标准，建立了将主流IPE与外围地区分开的跨大西洋秩序。本文是一场辩论的一部分，旨在提高人们对拉丁美洲对 IPE 贡献的认识。它强调思想与政治实践之间的联系，通过研究阿根廷、巴西、智利、哥伦比亚和墨西哥主要期刊上发表的作品，研究该子领域在 2000 年至 2021 年间的发展情况。讨论了三个中心论点。首先，拉丁美洲的 IPE 领域在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界提出之前就已经发展起来，并且与主流观点分开，因为独特的地区问题不能很好地融入主流方法的框架内。其次，地区期刊中关于 IPE 主题的争论十分活跃，20 世纪 50 年代和 1960 年代的知识传统不断被修正。第三，与主流国际关系关注政策成功的偏见相反，拉丁美洲的IPE与政策的制定密切相关，这些政策经常审查与该地区所面临的不同危机相关的政策实施过程中的逆境。