This research focuses on an increasingly important question associated with the state of military occupation as part of International Humanitarian Law, namely, to what extent the rights and duties of an occupying power are to be broadened or otherwise minimized when an occupation of a foreign territory lasts for a long period of time? This question is necessitated by the practices of some occupying powers that claim their ‘original’ authority over occupied areas should exceed the original rights embodied in the legal corpus on military occupation due to the prolonged nature of their military presence. This research focuses on the state of the Israeli military occupation over the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs.) and found that the Israeli practices are calculated in this direction, i.e., the expansionist policy, which ultimately conflict with the corpus of rules of international law on military occupation.

中文翻译：

---

长期军事占领：重新思考以色列对巴勒斯坦被占领土的占领

本研究重点关注作为国际人道法一部分的与军事占领状态相关的一个日益重要的问题，即当对外国领土的占领持续时，占领国的权利和义务应扩大或以其他方式减少到何种程度很长一段时间？这个问题是由于一些占领国的做法所必需的，这些占领国声称，由于其军事存在的长期性，其对被占领地区的“原始”权力应超出军事占领法律体系中所体现的原始权利。本研究重点关注以色列对巴勒斯坦被占领土的军事占领状况（选择s.）并发现以色列的做法就是朝着这个方向计算的，即扩张主义政策，这最终与军事占领的国际法规则相冲突。