当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
arXiv.cond-mat.mtrl-sci
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Making the cut: end effects and the benefits of slicing
arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science Pub Date : 2023-10-28 , DOI: arxiv-2310.18595 Bharath Antarvedi Goda, David Labonte, Mattia Bacca
arXiv - PHYS - Materials Science Pub Date : 2023-10-28 , DOI: arxiv-2310.18595 Bharath Antarvedi Goda, David Labonte, Mattia Bacca
Cutting mechanics in soft solids have been a subject of study for several
decades, an interest fuelled by the multitude of its applications, including
material testing, manufacturing, and biomedical technology. Wire cutting is the
simplest model system to analyze the cutting resistance of a soft material.
However, even for this simple system, the complex failure mechanisms that
underpin cutting are still not completely understood. Several models that
connect the critical cutting force to the radius of the wire and the key
mechanical properties of the cut material have been proposed. An almost
ubiquitous simplifying assumption is a state of plane (and anti-plane) strain
in the material. In this paper, we show that this assumption can lead to
erroneous conclusions because even such a simple cutting problem is essentially
three-dimensional. A planar approximation restricts the analysis to the stress
distribution in the mid-plane. However, through finite element modeling, we
reveal that the maximal tensile stress - and thus the likely location of cut
initiation - is in fact located in the front plane. Friction reduces the
magnitude of this stress, but this detrimental effect can be counteracted by
large slice-to-push (shear-to-indentation) ratios. The introduction of these
end effects helps reconcile a recent controversy around the role of friction in
wire cutting, for it implies that slicing can indeed reduce required cutting
forces, but only if the slice-push ratio and the friction coefficient are
sufficiently large. Material strain-stiffening reduces the critical indentation
depth required to initiate the cut further and thus needs to be considered when
cutting non-linearly elastic materials.
中文翻译:
进行切割:最终效果和切片的好处
几十年来,软固体中的切削力学一直是研究的主题,其众多应用(包括材料测试、制造和生物医学技术)激发了人们的兴趣。线切割是分析软材料切削阻力的最简单的模型系统。然而,即使对于这个简单的系统,支撑切割的复杂故障机制仍然没有被完全理解。已经提出了几种将临界切削力与线材半径和被切削材料的关键机械性能联系起来的模型。几乎普遍存在的简化假设是材料中的平面(和反平面)应变状态。在本文中,我们表明这种假设可能会导致错误的结论,因为即使如此简单的切割问题本质上也是三维的。平面近似将分析限制为中平面内的应力分布。然而,通过有限元建模,我们揭示了最大拉伸应力(以及因此可能的切割起始位置)实际上位于前平面。摩擦会降低这种应力的大小,但这种有害影响可以通过大的切片与推力(剪切与压痕)比率来抵消。这些末端效应的引入有助于调和最近关于在线切割中摩擦作用的争论,因为它意味着切片确实可以减少所需的切削力,但前提是切片推力比和摩擦系数足够大。材料应变强化降低了进一步开始切割所需的临界压痕深度,因此在切割非线性弹性材料时需要考虑。
更新日期:2023-10-31
中文翻译:
进行切割:最终效果和切片的好处
几十年来,软固体中的切削力学一直是研究的主题,其众多应用(包括材料测试、制造和生物医学技术)激发了人们的兴趣。线切割是分析软材料切削阻力的最简单的模型系统。然而,即使对于这个简单的系统,支撑切割的复杂故障机制仍然没有被完全理解。已经提出了几种将临界切削力与线材半径和被切削材料的关键机械性能联系起来的模型。几乎普遍存在的简化假设是材料中的平面(和反平面)应变状态。在本文中,我们表明这种假设可能会导致错误的结论,因为即使如此简单的切割问题本质上也是三维的。平面近似将分析限制为中平面内的应力分布。然而,通过有限元建模,我们揭示了最大拉伸应力(以及因此可能的切割起始位置)实际上位于前平面。摩擦会降低这种应力的大小,但这种有害影响可以通过大的切片与推力(剪切与压痕)比率来抵消。这些末端效应的引入有助于调和最近关于在线切割中摩擦作用的争论,因为它意味着切片确实可以减少所需的切削力,但前提是切片推力比和摩擦系数足够大。材料应变强化降低了进一步开始切割所需的临界压痕深度,因此在切割非线性弹性材料时需要考虑。