In the area of human biodata governance, one of the most pressing questions is how to address the tension between fostering innovation and protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms that arise from the development, deployment, and use of AI and data processing. On the one hand, data collected and stored in biobanks hold great promise, particularly for improving health care. However, the improper handling of these vast amounts of biodata also raises unresolved legal and ethical issues. This article aims to contribute to the debate on the protection of human biodata by examining the EU acquis on data ownership and questioning whether there is any role for data ownership. On the basis of de lege lata, this paper argues that there is no such ownership protection for human biodata, but there are some indications. On the basis of de lege feranda, through a doctrinal legal analysis, it argues that biodata should not be subject to general ownership rights without a specific justification demonstrating the need for ownership of data from an economic and social perspective.

在人类生物数据治理领域，最紧迫的问题之一是如何解决促进创新与保护人工智能和数据处理的开发、部署和使用所产生的基本权利和自由之间的紧张关系。一方面，生物库中收集和存储的数据前景广阔，特别是在改善医疗保健方面。然而，对这些大量生物数据的不当处理也引发了未解决的法律和道德问题。本文旨在通过研究欧盟关于数据所有权的法律并质疑数据所有权是否有任何作用，为有关人类生物数据保护的辩论做出贡献。本文根据现行法认为，人类生物数据不存在这种所有权保护，但也有一些迹象。在《拟议法》的基础上，通过理论上的法律分析，认为如果没有具体理由从经济和社会角度证明数据所有权的必要性，则生物数据不应受到一般所有权的约束。