How does the publication of Confessions of the Flesh impact feminist critique of Foucault's History of Sexuality project? The paper addresses this question in two ways: by asking how reflection on continuities and ruptures has, and can, be productive for feminist critique; and by revisiting the role of women in all four volumes. The terms of their inclusion have been considered an omission, particularly because the project omits same-sex eros between women. Where women appear, they are framed as spouses, or as subordinated to some form of authority. And yet, insofar as the project contains more than one genealogical dimension, Foucault's “marriages” also belong to proximate plurigenealogies. In Confession's focus on the conditions for a juridical and divided self's subjectivation by will and desire, even the limited parameters within which women appear in the project incite the following question. What are the implications of Confessions of the Flesh's juridical self for genealogies of female subjectivation?

中文翻译：

---

多基因论：福柯《肉体的忏悔》中的婚姻和对女性的称呼

《肉体的忏悔》的出版如何影响女权主义对福柯性史的批判项目？本文以两种方式解决了这个问题：通过询问对连续性和断裂性的反思如何并且能够对女权主义批评产生成效；并重新审视了所有四卷中女性的角色。他们的纳入条款被认为是一个遗漏，特别是因为该项目忽略了女性之间的同性性欲。当女性出现时，她们就被视为配偶，或者服从某种形式的权威。然而，就该计划包含不止一个谱系维度而言，福柯的“婚姻”也属于近似的多谱系学。在《忏悔录》中，重点关注司法和分裂的自我通过意志和欲望而实现主体化的条件，甚至女性在该项目中出现的有限范围也引发了以下问题。