The article explains the problematic Second Teacher episode in the so-called developmental interpretation of IGT recently proposed by M. R. Whitenton and J. R. C. Cousland. The article shows that the killing of the second teacher in the text of Gs, which is appropriately identified as problematic for the developmental interpretation, appears to be a later version of the episode that most likely already sought to supplement a more original account. In the earliest recoverable form, preserved in the early versions (Syriac, Latin and Ethiopic), the story consistently does not blame Jesus for the death of the second teacher, either in the episode itself or in the other passages. So in the earliest surviving version(s), the teacher dies but not because of a curse from Jesus. Therefore, this episode does not disturb the so-called developmental interpretation.

中文翻译：

---

多马婴儿福音中第二位教师的故事：对最近发展解释讨论的贡献

这篇文章解释了 MR Whitenton 和 JRC Cousland 最近提出的所谓 IGT 发展解释中存在问题的第二老师情节。文章显示，Gs 文本中第二位老师被杀，这被适当地确定为发展解释的问题，似乎是该集的后期版本，很可能已经寻求补充更原始的叙述。在最早的可恢复形式中，保留在早期版本（叙利亚语、拉丁语和埃塞俄比亚语）中，这个故事始终没有将第二位老师的死归咎于耶稣，无论是在这一集本身还是在其他段落中。因此，在现存最早的版本中，老师死了，但并不是因为耶稣的诅咒。所以，