In this study I will argue that, while Matthew and Luke’s redaction of the Markan Transfiguration present Jesus as the antitype of Moses, Mark’s own account does not. Rather, Mark uses typology to narrate Jesus into the stories of Elijah and Moses, both of whom are described in the Jewish scriptures as ascending a mountain to talk with God in narratives in which the Angel of YHWH also features. Distinctive features of Mark’s account suggest that Mark wishes to associate Jesus, not with Moses, but with YHWH and his angel, using the scriptural ambiguity between the Angel of YHWH and Israel’s God to generate a similar ambiguity around the divine identity of Jesus. Consequently, Mark’s Transfiguration presents a “higher” Christology than that of the Transfigurations in the other Synoptic Gospels. In Mark’s Transfiguration, Jesus is compared, not to human prophets, but to the anthropomorphic manifestations of Israel’s God at Sinai and Horeb.

在这项研究中，我将论证，虽然马太和路加对马可显圣容的修订将耶稣呈现为摩西的原型，但马可自己的记载却并非如此。相反，马可使用预表法将耶稣叙述到以利亚和摩西的故事中，在犹太圣经中，这两个人都被描述为上山与上帝交谈，在叙述中也有耶和华的天使的身影。马可记述的显着特征表明，马可希望将耶稣与耶和华和他的天使联系起来，而不是与摩西联系起来，利用耶和华的天使与以色列的上帝之间的圣经模糊性，在耶稣的神圣身份周围产生了类似的模糊性。因此，马可福音的变形论呈现出比其他对观福音书中的变形论“更高”的基督论。在马可福音的变形中，耶稣不是与人类先知进行比较，而是与以色列上帝在西奈山和何烈山的拟人化表现进行比较。