A number of discourse functions of canonical antonyms have been quantified and classified in English and across languages, each of which is associated with typical syntactic frames. Taking such a classification of canonical antonymy as an analytical toolkit, (Davies, Matt. 2012. A new approach to oppositions in discourse: the role of syntactic frames in the triggering of noncanonical oppositions. Journal of English Linguistics 40(1). 41–73) quantified and qualified the role of these frames in triggering non-canonical oppositions in English news discourse. Synergizing the provisional typologies of canonical antonymy (Hassanein, Hamada. 2018. Discourse functions of opposition in Classical Arabic: The case in ḥadīth genre. Lingua 201. 18–44; Jones, Steven. 2002. Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London and New York: Routledge.) and non-canonical opposition (Davies, Matt. 2012. A new approach to oppositions in discourse: the role of syntactic frames in the triggering of noncanonical oppositions. Journal of English Linguistics 40(1). 41–73), this study has sought to develop a dynamic toolkit for the quantitative and qualitative analyses of non-canonical opposition across Arabic varieties and potentially other languages. The toolkit was tested quantitatively and qualitatively against a dataset of 2125 non-canonical oppositional pairs collected from the Qur’an with reference to the Qur’anic Arabic Corpus. Results showed that the syntactic frames which house a wide range of co-occurring canonical antonyms also house a wider range of non-canonical oppositions in binary and trinary representations of abstract and concrete entities. The role of syntactic frames in the triggering of non-canonical oppositions is quantitatively and qualitatively significant for locating and explicating the ideological repercussions of oppositions towards Qur’an interpretation. It is concluded that a synergy of typologies results in a replicable pathway for analysis.

中文翻译：

---

两个工具（套件）的故事：《古兰经》话语中从正典反义词到非正典对立

英语和跨语言中的许多规范反义词的话语功能已经被量化和分类，每一个都与典型的句法框架相关联。将规范反义词的这种分类作为分析工具包，（Davies，Matt.2012。话语中对立的新方法：句法框架在触发非规范对立中的作用。英语语言学杂志40（1）。41-73）量化并限定了这些框架在引发英语新闻话语中非规范对立中的作用。协同规范反义词的临时类型学（Hassanein，Hamada。2018。古典阿拉伯语中对立的话语功能：ḥadīth 流派的案例。林瓜201. 18-44；琼斯、史蒂文. 2002年。反义词：基于语料库的视角。伦敦和纽约：Routledge。）和非规范对立（Davies，Matt. 2012。话语中对立的新方法：句法框架在触发非规范对立中的作用。英语语言学杂志40（1）。41-73），本研究试图开发一个动态工具包，用于对阿拉伯语变体和潜在其他语言的非规范对立进行定量和定性分析。该工具包针对从《古兰经》中收集的 2125 个非规范对立对并参考《古兰经阿拉伯语语料库》收集的数据集进行了定量和定性测试。结果表明，包含广泛共现规范反义词的句法框架还包含抽象和具体实体的二元和三元表示中更广泛的非规范对立。句法框架在引发非正典反对中的作用对于定位和解释对古兰经解释的反对的意识形态影响在数量和质量上都具有重要意义。