This study focuses on the role of justification astrategies in the production and mobilization of multiple deservingness framings towards refugees in everyday work life. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Turkish employers in labour-intensive sectors in İzmir, the article presents a city-centred, evidence supported case which answers on the basis of which criteria Syrian refugee workers are deemed deserving and undeserving. It argues that the production of deservingness frames is not uniform and mutable across time and space, thereby actors can engage in different justification strategies in similar situations since the constitution and mobilization of deservingness frames are context-dependent. This study further argues that Turkish employers’ narratives towards Syrian refugee workers are shaped by not only economic interests but also unique features of historical and socio-cultural dynamics at the local level, resulting in three distinct deservingness frames: established deservingness, fragile deservingness, and established undeservingness.

中文翻译：

---

伊兹密尔日常工作生活中难民多重应得框架的构建

本研究的重点是正当理由策略在日常工作生活中对难民产生和动员多种应得框架的作用。本文根据对伊兹密尔劳动密集型行业土耳其雇主的深入访谈，提出了一个以城市为中心、有证据支持的案例，根据叙利亚难民工人被认为值得和不值得的标准来回答。它认为，应得框架的产生在时间和空间上并不统一且可变，因此，由于应得框架的构成和动员是依赖于情境的，因此行动者可以在相似的情况下采取不同的辩护策略。