当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Replies to Wallace, Queloz, and Kirwin
European Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-06-27 , DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12876
Bernard Reginster 1
Affiliation  

In this article, I reply to the comments offered by R. Jay Wallace, Matthieu Queloz, and Claire Kirwin on my book, The Will to Nothingness. An Essay on Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morality (OUP, 2021). These comments and my replies cover central features of the book, including my analysis of ressentiment as an expression of the will to power; the concept of self-undermining functionality I introduce to make sense of Nietzsche's critique of the ascetic ideal; and my reasons for omitting to examine the “unconditional will to truth,” which he presents as the latest embodiment of this ideal.

中文翻译:

对华莱士、奎洛兹和柯文的回复

在这篇文章中,我回复了 R. Jay Wallace、Matthieu Queloz 和 Claire Kirwin 对我的书《虚无意志》提出的评论。关于尼采道德谱系的论文(OUP,2021)。这些评论和我的回复涵盖了本书的核心特征,包括我对作为权力意志表达的怨恨的分析;我引入自我破坏功能的概念是为了理解尼采对禁欲主义理想的批判;以及我省略考察“追求真理的无条件意志”的原因,他将其视为这一理想的最新体现。
更新日期:2023-06-27
down
wechat
bug