This paper details the specific aims and purposes of the Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria; a series of evaluation tools designed to aid in remanufacturing inspection operations. The background and justification of this model, which is detailed in a separate work, identifies ill definition and an over reliance on opinion as barriers to effective inspection activities. Analysis of this issue led to the building of the Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria; a 4-model foundation that aims to provide a more comprehensive and more structured approach to the inspection stages of the typical remanufacturing process. Through expert opinion this model was evaluated multiple times. One review was used to gauge the level of idea communication within an academic situation, this was followed up by external industrial reviews of the model by those most likely to utilise it during industry practice. After extensive feedback and modification the final model assessment was carried out with an expert panel that were instructed to be as critical as possible with the model in order to ensure that its evaluation was as robust as possible.

The results of these reviews were all on the positive side of the scale. Multiple statements regarding the potential value and suitability of each model aspect and justification for their use was presented in the format of an evaluation form which was used by those involved to present their findings and feedback. Negative feedback was addressed and successful modification yielding more positive results in the next evaluation was achieved.

Though walking the line between specificity and generic was noted to be the most difficult factor to consider when developing the models, the final findings of the evaluation show that significant value was perceived by those operating within industry. The potential benefits of customised variants of the models is acknowledged by all parties as a possible future avenue of research.

本文详细介绍了损害评估跟踪标准的具体目标和目的；一系列旨在帮助再制造检查操作的评估工具。该模型的背景和理由（在另一篇文章中详细介绍）将错误的定义和过度依赖意见确定为有效检查活动的障碍。对这个问题的分析导致了损害评估跟踪标准的建立；一个 4 模型基础，旨在为典型再制造过程的检查阶段提供更全面、更结构化的方法。通过专家意见，该模型被多次评估。一篇评论被用来衡量学术情境中思想交流的水平，随后，最有可能在行业实践中使用该模型的人员对该模型进行了外部行业审查。在广泛的反馈和修改之后，最终的模型评估由一个专家小组进行，该专家小组被指示对模型尽可能严格，以确保其评估尽可能稳健。

这些审查的结果都是积极的。关于每个模型方面的潜在价值和适用性及其使用理由的多项陈述以评估表的形式呈现，相关人员使用该表来展示他们的发现和反馈。负面反馈得到解决，成功的修改在下一次评估中产生了更积极的结果。

尽管在开发模型时注意到特异性和通用性之间的界线是最难考虑的因素，但评估的最终结果表明，行业内的经营者认识到了重要的价值。各方都承认模型的定制变体的潜在好处是未来可能的研究途径。