Across the academy, there is growing concern over diversity within academic institutions. According to recent research published in three top political science journals, members of historically marginalized groups remain underrepresented and marginalized in submissions, publications, and even reviewer pools (Ayoub 2022; Bell et al. 2020; Reinhardt, Windsor, and King 2022). Expectations that scholars, especially early career researchers (ECRs), “publish or perish” thus exacerbate intersectional inequalities within the discipline (Briscoe-Palmer and Mattocks 2021; McKenzie 2017; Steinþórsdóttir et al. 2018). Further, the overwhelming pressure to publish at all costs can commodify knowledge production and foster a toxic, competitive environment based on peer rivalry rather than collaboration for the sake of advancing knowledge (Horta and Li 2023, 269–70, 271–72).

中文翻译：

---

解决政治科学出版中的“隐藏课程”

在整个学术界，人们越来越关注学术机构内部的多样性。根据最近发表在三本顶级政治学期刊上的研究，历史上被边缘化的群体的成员在提交的论文、出版物甚至审稿人库中仍然没有被充分代表和边缘化（Ayoub 2022；Bell 等人 2020；Reinhardt、Windsor 和 King 2022）。因此，对学者，尤其是早期职业研究人员 (ECR) 的期望“发表或灭亡”加剧了学科内的交叉不平等（Briscoe-Palmer 和 Mattocks 2021；McKenzie 2017；Steinþórsdóttir 等人 2018）。此外，不惜一切代价出版的压倒性压力会使知识生产商品化，并在同行竞争的基础上营造有毒的竞争环​​境，而不是为了推进知识而进行的合作（Horta 和 Li 2023，