Parties to a contract may designate the court or courts of a particular country to decide their disputes which have arisen or may arise from a particular legal relationship. Many countries give party autonomy its binding effect in selecting the competent court and enforcing jurisdiction agreements. There is complete silence in Iranian law regarding the enforcement of jurisdiction agreements. The current study examines the enforcement of jurisdiction agreements under Iranian law. This study investigates whether parties in international disputes can agree to confer jurisdiction to Iranian non-competent courts and whether they can agree to exclude the jurisdiction of competent Iranian courts in favour of foreign courts. The study contends that parties can agree to grant jurisdiction to Iran's non-competent courts unless the excluded foreign court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear the dispute. On the other hand, parties may agree to exclude the jurisdiction of the competent Iranian courts in favour of foreign courts unless the Iranian courts assert exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute.

合同当事人可以指定一个或多个特定国家的法院来裁决他们因特定法律关系而产生或可能产生的争议。许多国家赋予当事人意思自治在选择管辖法院和执行管辖协议方面的约束力。伊朗法律对管辖权协议的执行完全保持沉默。目前的研究审查了伊朗法律下管辖权协议的执行情况。本研究调查国际争端的当事方是否可以同意将管辖权授予伊朗非主管法院，以及他们是否可以同意排除伊朗主管法院的管辖权以支持外国法院。该研究认为，各方可以同意授予伊朗管辖权 s 非主管法院，除非被排除在外的外国法院具有审理争议的专属管辖权。另一方面，当事方可能同意排除伊朗主管法院的管辖权以支持外国法院，除非伊朗法院对争议主张专属管辖权。