Abstract (Lang: English):

Interfaith dialogue is a promising conflict resolution method and encourages participants to learn about and appreciate religious diversity. Yet, participants often need a facilitator’s help to learn how to converse successfully across areas of ideological differences, such as religion. A valuable resource for facilitators and scholars of interfaith dialogue would be intricate knowledge of how successful dialogue happens, particularly when participants disagree with one another. In this study, applied conversation analysis was used to examine moments of disagreement in interfaith dialogue. Beginning with abdicated other-initiated repair, participants expressed differences in opinion through assertion and counter-assertion sequences where they followed both other- and self-selected turn-taking patterns and used membership categories to bolster their claims. This analysis offers insight into how specific conversational tactics might lead to successful interfaith dialogue during critical moments of disagreement.

摘要（语言：英语）：

宗教间对话是一种很有前途的冲突解决方法，它鼓励参与者了解和欣赏宗教多样性。然而，参与者通常需要协调员的帮助才能学习如何跨意识形态差异领域（例如宗教）成功地进行对话。对于不同信仰间对话的推动者和学者来说，一项宝贵的资源是关于成功对话如何发生的复杂知识，尤其是当参与者彼此不同意时。在这项研究中，应用对话分析被用来检查不同信仰对话中的分歧时刻。从放弃其他发起的修复开始，参与者通过断言和反断言序列表达意见分歧，他们遵循其他和自我选择的轮流模式，并使用成员类别来支持他们的主张。该分析提供了关于特定对话策略如何在分歧的关键时刻导致成功的宗教间对话的见解。