Guido Löhr's recent article makes several insightful and productive suggestions about how to proceed with the empirical study of collective action. However, their critique of the conclusions drawn in Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) is undermined by some issues with the interpretation of the debate and paper. This discussion article clears up those issues, presents new findings from experiments developed in response to Löhr's critiques, reflects on the role of experimental research in the development and refinement of philosophical theories, and adds to Löhr's suggestions about the path forward.

中文翻译：

---

对 LÖhr 的回应：为什么我们仍然需要一种新的规范主义

Guido Löhr 最近的文章就如何进行集体行动的实证研究提出了一些富有洞察力和富有成效的建议。然而，他们对 Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) 中得出的结论的批评被辩论和论文的解释方面的一些问题所破坏。这篇讨论文章澄清了这些问题，提出了为回应洛尔的批评而开发的实验的新发现，反思了实验研究在哲学理论的发展和完善中的作用，并补充了洛尔关于前进道路的建议。