I consider Katherine Hawley's commitment account of interpersonal trustworthiness alongside her sceptical challenge regarding the value of philosophically modelling institutional trustworthiness as distinct from reliability. I argue, pace Hawley's challenge, that there would be significant diagnostic and explanatory loss if we were to content ourselves with ideas of institutional (un)reliability alone; and I offer an illustrative case where institutional unreliability is only the half of it, indicating that when it comes to certain kinds of institutional dysfunction, we do need philosophical models of institutional ‘distrustworthiness’ if we are to achieve a proper diagnosis.

中文翻译：

---

诊断制度化的“不信任”

我认为凯瑟琳·霍利 (Katherine Hawley) 对人际信任的承诺说明，以及她对从哲学上将机构信任建模为有别于可靠性的价值的怀疑挑战。我认为，按照霍利的挑战，如果我们仅仅满足于制度（不）可靠性的想法，将会有重大的诊断和解释损失；我提供了一个说明性案例，其中制度不可靠性只是其中的一半，表明当涉及到某些制度功能障碍时，如果我们要做出正确的诊断，我们确实需要制度“不可信”的哲学模型。