Abstract

Adopting the approach of O’Shaughnessy et al. (2020 O’Shaughnessy, B. R., Manning, R. M., Greenwood, R. M., Vargas-Moniz, M. J., Loubière, S., Spinnewijn, F., Gaboardi, M., Wolf, J. R., Bokszczanin, A., Bernad, R., Blid, M., Ornelas, J., The, H.-E. U., & Consortium, S. G. (2020). Home as a base for a well-lived life: Comparing the capabilities of homeless service users in Housing First and the staircase of transition in Europe. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1762725[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), this article attempts to study the impact of different Greek housing services on the freedom of beneficiaries to develop their capabilities for a well-lived life, according to the views of service providers. After drawing links between capabilities, housing approaches and welfare, the article examines four housing programmes in Greece—two for homeless people and two for asylum seekers—through interviews with representatives of housing services. The article argues that Housing First services are thought to have greater impact on beneficiaries’ capabilities than services based on the ‘Staircase of Transition’ approach, but the incomplete application of Housing First schemes, to date, erodes the maximisation of their social effectiveness.

摘要

采用 O'Shaughnessy 等人的方法。( 2020 O'Shaughnessy, BR、Manning, RM、Greenwood, RM、Vargas-Moniz, MJ、Loubière, S.、Spinnewijn, F.、Gaboardi, M.、Wolf, JR 、 Bokszczanin, A.、Bernad , R.、Blid , M. , Ornelas, J. , The, H.-EU , & Consortium, SG ( 2020 )。家是美好生活的基地：比较欧洲住房优先和过渡阶梯中无家可归者服务用户的能力。住房、理论与社会，38 (3), 343 – 364。https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1762725 [Taylor & Francis Online]、[Web of Science®]  、[Google Scholar])，本文试图根据服务提供者的观点，研究不同的希腊住房服务对受益人发展其能力以过上美好生活的自由的影响。在描绘了能力、住房方法和福利之间的联系后，本文通过采访住房服务代表，研究了希腊的四个住房计划——两个针对无家可归者，两个针对寻求庇护者。文章认为，住房优先服务被认为比基于“过渡阶梯”方法的服务对受益人的能力有更大的影响，但迄今为止，住房优先计划的不完整应用削弱了其社会效益的最大化。