当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMJ › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts
The BMJ ( IF 93.6 ) Pub Date : 2023-03-08 , DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074224
Ying Sun 1 , Yin Wu 1, 2 , Suiqiong Fan 1 , Tiffany Dal Santo 1, 2 , Letong Li 1 , Xiaowen Jiang 1 , Kexin Li 1 , Yutong Wang 1 , Amina Tasleem 1 , Ankur Krishnan 1 , Chen He 1 , Olivia Bonardi 1 , Jill T Boruff 3 , Danielle B Rice 4, 5 , Sarah Markham 6 , Brooke Levis 1 , Marleine Azar 1 , Ian Thombs-Vite 1 , Dipika Neupane 1 , Branka Agic 7, 8 , Christine Fahim 9 , Michael S Martin 10, 11 , Sanjeev Sockalingam 7, 12 , Gustavo Turecki 2, 13 , Andrea Benedetti 14, 15, 16 , Brett D Thombs 2, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19
Affiliation  

Objective To synthesise results of mental health outcomes in cohorts before and during the covid-19 pandemic. Design Systematic review. Data sources Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, medRxiv, and Open Science Framework Preprints. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies comparing general mental health, anxiety symptoms, or depression symptoms assessed from 1 January 2020 or later with outcomes collected from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 in any population, and comprising ≥90% of the same participants before and during the covid-19 pandemic or using statistical methods to account for missing data. Restricted maximum likelihood random effects meta-analyses (worse covid-19 outcomes representing positive change) were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Results As of 11 April 2022, 94 411 unique titles and abstracts including 137 unique studies from 134 cohorts were reviewed. Most of the studies were from high income (n=105, 77%) or upper middle income (n=28, 20%) countries. Among general population studies, no changes were found for general mental health (standardised mean difference (SMD)change 0.11, 95% confidence interval −0.00 to 0.22) or anxiety symptoms (0.05, −0.04 to 0.13), but depression symptoms worsened minimally (0.12, 0.01 to 0.24). Among women or female participants, general mental health (0.22, 0.08 to 0.35), anxiety symptoms (0.20, 0.12 to 0.29), and depression symptoms (0.22, 0.05 to 0.40) worsened by minimal to small amounts. In 27 other analyses across outcome domains among subgroups other than women or female participants, five analyses suggested that symptoms worsened by minimal or small amounts, and two suggested minimal or small improvements. No other subgroup experienced changes across all outcome domains. In three studies with data from March to April 2020 and late 2020, symptoms were unchanged from pre-covid-19 levels at both assessments or increased initially then returned to pre-covid-19 levels. Substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias were present across analyses. Conclusions High risk of bias in many studies and substantial heterogeneity suggest caution in interpreting results. Nonetheless, most symptom change estimates for general mental health, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms were close to zero and not statistically significant, and significant changes were of minimal to small magnitudes. Small negative changes occurred for women or female participants in all domains. The authors will update the results of this systematic review as more evidence accrues, with study results posted online (). Review registration PROSPERO CRD42020179703. Study data and statistical codes are available via the Open Science Framework ().
更新日期:2023-03-09
down
wechat
bug