The United States has a long and controversial history with abortion that did not end with Roe v. Wade. Almost immediately thereafter, anti-choice politicians commenced a decades-long effort to restrict access to abortion, recently culminating in the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe. One successful attempt to restrict access immediately following Roe was the Hyde Amendment. With more Americans covered by federally funded health insurance than ever, the Hyde Amendment creates an insurmountable barrier to abortion care for those who lack other sources of financing.Despite the impacts of the Hyde Amendment, support for discontinuing the amendment has been weak. For the first time in over forty years, the United States is in a position to change its abortion funding policy. Beyond ending Hyde, the EACH Act has been introduced in Congress to ensure permanent funding for abortion through all federally funded insurance programs. To secure funding for abortion and reduce barriers to access, advocates must press the federal government to pass legislation such as the EACH Act.

中文翻译：

---

每个人的权利：联邦堕胎护理基金对医疗改革的重要性

美国在堕胎方面有着悠久而有争议的历史，但并未以 Roe v. Wade 案告终。几乎紧接着，反对堕胎的政客们开始了长达数十年的限制堕胎的努力，最近以推翻罗伊的多布斯决定告终。在 Roe 之后，一项成功的限制访问的尝试是海德修正案。随着越来越多的美国人享受联邦资助的健康保险，海德修正案为那些缺乏其他资金来源的人设置了无法逾越的堕胎护理障碍。尽管海德修正案产生了影响，但对停止修正案的支持一直很弱。四十多年来，美国第一次能够改变其堕胎资助政策。除了结束海德，国会引入了 EACH 法案，以确保通过所有联邦资助的保险计划为堕胎提供永久性资金。为了获得堕胎资金并减少堕胎障碍，倡导者必须敦促联邦政府通过诸如 EACH 法案之类的立法。