当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Law Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Crisis Pregnancy Centers: An Inherently Unjust Limitation to Reproductive Rights
American Journal of Law & Medicine ( IF 0.694 ) Pub Date : 2023-01-30 , DOI: 10.1017/amj.2022.28
Rebecca Feinberg 1 , Danielle Pacia 2
Affiliation  

Abortion, though afforded certain legal protections, can be challenging to access in many areas of the United States, a problem exacerbated by the presence of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs). CPCs present themselves as clinics that provide a full spectrum of free pregnancy consultation services, but in fact are pro-life, anti-abortion organizations.1 From the outside, CPCs appear to be neutral health and welfare establishments, leading women *to believe they will receive unbiased guidance based on their best interests. In reality, CPCs recruit unsuspecting women into their facilities to deter them from accessing abortions, promoting only two options: parenthood or adoption.2 Women are lured into CPCs with the promise of free services which range from medical care to clothing and other items. At its most basic level, these deceptive practices violate the autonomy of women seeking reproductive care, perpetuating unjust limitation of access to quality medical care.

中文翻译:

危机怀孕中心:对生育权利的固有不公正限制

堕胎虽然提供了某些法律保护,但在美国的许多地区可能难以获得,危机怀孕中心 (CPC) 的存在加剧了这个问题。CPC 将自己伪装成提供全方位免费怀孕咨询服务的诊所,但实际上是支持生命、反对堕胎的组织。1个从外面看,CPC 似乎是中立的健康和福利机构,导致妇女*相信她们会根据自己的最大利益得到公正的指导。实际上,CPC 招募毫无戒心的妇女进入他们的设施,以阻止她们进行堕胎,只提倡两种选择:为人父母或领养。2个妇女被 CPC 以免费服务的承诺所吸引,这些服务范围从医疗到服装和其他物品。在最基本的层面上,这些欺骗性做法侵犯了寻求生育保健的妇女的自主权,使获得优质医疗保健的机会受到不公正的限制。
更新日期:2023-01-30
down
wechat
bug