This article explores the limitations of the oft-used biopolitical frameworks of interpreting the regulatory emergency measures that have been enacted worldwide in the face of the spreading pandemic of COVID-19. Not only have the state responses to coronavirus often been beset by manner of “biopolitical failures,” it is also the Foucauldian emphasis on the top-down formation and application of immunity that produces a view of health security that is much too narrow. In proposing an alternative framework, the article draws from the spherology of Peter Sloterdijk and suggests a transition from bio- to a distinctly sphero-political theory of immunity that is capable of integrating the ontological synergies that exist between human bodies, spaces, and atmospheres. More specifically, the spheropolitics of coronavirus are discussed in relation to the security dispositif of the household and examined through the case of the Czech Republic.

中文翻译：

---

超越生命政治的安全：冠状病毒大流行的球体政治、共同免疫和气氛

本文探讨了经常使用的生物政治框架的局限性，这些框架在解释面对 COVID-19 的蔓延大流行时已在全球范围内制定的监管紧急措施。不仅国家对冠状病毒的反应经常受到“生命政治失败”方式的困扰，而且福柯式对免疫力自上而下的形成和应用的强调产生了一种过于狭隘的健康安全观。在提出替代框架时，这篇文章借鉴了 Peter Sloterdijk 的球体学，并建议从免疫的生物理论过渡到明显的球体政治免疫理论，这种理论能够整合存在于人体、空间和大气之间的本体论协同作用。进一步来说，