The last years’ achievements in neuroscience are key for a philosophical analysis focused on the mind-body problem, such as the phenomenological approach.

The digital evolution, on the one hand, faces us with the interaction between the world of reality and the world of possibility. This means more than a mere coexistence between these two dimensions. Rather, a concrete feedback occurs among them, and this brings out unprecedented and unavoidable issues with regard to perceptual processes. On the other hand, the digital evolution allows for analyzing data and monitoring environmental systems, thus reasoning in a predictive way, anticipating problems, and checking ex ante their evolution and outcomes.

Neuroscience, for its part, with the experiments of Libet and their subsequent interpretations, has highlighted a consciousness of the unconscious made of ballistic and automatic processes, which constitutes the starting phase of our decisions and actions. This further confirmed that sequential and linear thinking is unable to address the brain-environment relationship that is key in understanding any cognitive process.

This analysis confirms the relevance of different aspects of Husserl’s phenomenology. There is, however, a “but,” which significantly reduces the extent of adherence to his point of view. Husserl assumed that an implicit horizon precedes or accompanies the acts of conscience. This is the material, impressional, passive, receptive, and, in some way, tacit dimension, strictly connected to the issue of genesis, i.e. the process of constitution of the analyzed entities. Thus, he drew a clear dividing line between this dimension and the phases of the self-controlling, vigilant conscience and its activity. In fact, his approach to the phenomenological problem is mainly oriented toward these phases.

过去几年在神经科学方面的成就对于专注于身心问题的哲学分析（例如现象学方法）至关重要。

一方面，数字化进化使我们面临现实世界与可能性世界之间的互动。这不仅仅意味着这两个维度之间的共存。相反，它们之间发生了具体的反馈，这带来了关于感知过程的前所未有的和不可避免的问题。另一方面，数字化演进允许分析数据和监测环境系统，从而以预测的方式进行推理、预测问题并事前检查它们的演进和结果。

就神经科学而言，通过 Libet 的实验及其随后的解释，突出了由弹道和自动过程构成的无意识意识，它构成了我们决策和行动的起始阶段。这进一步证实了顺序和线性思维无法解决对理解任何认知过程至关重要的大脑-环境关系。

这一分析证实了胡塞尔现象学不同方面的相关性。然而，有一个“但是”，它显着降低了对他观点的坚持程度。胡塞尔假设一个隐含的视野先于或伴随着良心的行为。这是物质的、印象的、被动的、接受的，并且在某种程度上是默契的维度，与起源问题密切相关，即被分析实体的构成过程。因此，他在这个维度与自我控制、警惕的良心及其活动的阶段之间划出了一条清晰的分界线。事实上，他处理现象学问题的方法主要面向这些阶段。