ABSTRACT

To minimize market fragmentation, optimize efficiencies through compatible digital architectures, and encourage collaboration, high-level smart city harmonization efforts have been advocated across Europe. This paper critically analyzes attempts by the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities Six Nations Forum (EIP-SCC 6N) to constitute a common smart city management framework through application of a generic Blueprint. Analysis highlights how these efforts are brought to bear through four techniques: simplification, interoperability, integration, and authorization. Examining the adoption (and rejection) of these techniques underscores the importance of attending to distinctive urban contexts and alternative ways of knowing and acting in the city.

摘要

为了最大限度地减少市场碎片化、通过兼容的数字架构优化效率并鼓励协作，整个欧洲都在倡导高水平的智慧城市协调工作。本文批判性地分析了欧洲智能城市和社区创新伙伴关系六国论坛 (EIP-SCC 6N) 通过应用通用蓝图构建通用智能城市管理框架的尝试。分析强调了如何通过四种技术来实现这些努力：简化、互操作性、集成和授权。检查这些技术的采用（和拒绝）强调了关注独特的城市环境以及在城市中了解和行动的替代方式的重要性。