Hedonic and eudaimonic motives have been shown to have different effects on well-being, but most prior studies concentrated on hedonic well-being. To further verify the predictive associations between happiness motives (i.e., hedonic and eudaimonic motives) and well-being, especially eudaimonic well-being, we used a two-wave cross-lagged longitudinal design in a sample of 419 teenagers (mean age = 15.17 years, SD = 0.43 years) with an interval of eight months. The results showed that eudaimonic motives significantly predicted later hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, while only eudaimonic well-being, in turn, predicted later eudaimonic motives. There were no predictive associations between hedonic motives and two dimensions of well-being. After controlling the effects of age, gender, and subjective socioeconomic status, these results remained significant. Furthermore, after adding the lagged paths between two types of well-being, only eudaimonic well-being predicted eudaimonic motives, while eudaimonic motives could not predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Besides, eudaimonic well-being significantly predicted hedonic well-being, while negative affect rather than positive affect of hedonic well-being could predict eudaimonic well-being. These results provide further evidence for the directionality of the links between happiness motives and well-being, especially eudaimonic well-being in adolescents.

享乐和享乐动机已被证明对幸福感有不同的影响，但大多数先前的研究都集中在享乐福祉上。为了进一步验证幸福动机（即享乐动机和幸福动机）与幸福感，尤其是幸福幸福感之间的预测关联，我们在 419 名青少年（平均年龄 = 15.17年，SD = 0.43 年），间隔为 8 个月。结果表明，幸福动机显着预测了后来的享乐和幸福幸福，而只有幸福的幸福反过来又预测了后来的幸福动机。享乐动机与幸福的两个维度之间没有预测关联。在控制了年龄、性别和主观社会经济地位的影响后，这些结果仍然很重要。此外，加入两种幸福感之间的滞后路径后，只有幸福感能预测幸福感，而幸福感不能预测幸福感和幸福感。此外，幸福感显着预测幸福感，而幸福感的负面影响而不是正面影响可以预测幸福感。这些结果进一步证明了幸福动机与幸福感之间联系的方向性，尤其是青少年的幸福感。eudaimonic 幸福感显着预测享乐幸福感，而享乐幸福感的负面影响而不是积极影响可以预测 eudaimonic 幸福感。这些结果进一步证明了幸福动机与幸福感之间联系的方向性，尤其是青少年的幸福感。eudaimonic 幸福感显着预测享乐幸福感，而享乐幸福感的负面影响而不是积极影响可以预测 eudaimonic 幸福感。这些结果进一步证明了幸福动机与幸福感之间联系的方向性，尤其是青少年的幸福感。