The paper presents a dialogical approach applied to the analysis of argumentative strategies in philosophy and examines the case of the critical comments to the Tanner Lectures given by the Dutch biologist and primatologist, Frans de Waal, at Princeton University in November 2003. The paper is divided into five parts: the first advances the hypothesis that what seem puzzling aspects of philosophical argumentation to scholars in other academic fields are explained by the global role played by a series of arguments within a broader argumentative strategy, e.g. arguing that a question that seems important is not really worthwhile; the second presents five groups of dialectical operations, making use of concepts and tools from the dialectical dialogical approach (WaltonWalton and Krabbe, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, SUNY Press, Albany, 1995), Hubert Marraud's Argument dialectic (Marraud, En buena lógica. Una introducción a la teoría de la argumentación, Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, 2020) and from the vast tradition of formal dialectics and dialogical logic. In the remaining three sections, the comments of philosophers Christine M. Korsgaard, Philip Kitcher and Peter Singer to de Waal's Tanner Lectures are analyzed dialectically.

本文介绍了一种对话式方法，用于分析哲学中的论证策略，并考察了荷兰生物学家和灵长类动物学家弗兰斯·德瓦尔于 2003 年 11 月在普林斯顿大学对坦纳讲座发表的批评性评论的案例。本文分为分为五个部分：第一部分提出这样一个假设，即在其他学术领域的学者看来，哲学论证中令人费解的方面可以通过一系列论证在更广泛的论证策略中所起的全球作用来解释，例如，认为一个看起来很重要的问题是不值得；第二部分介绍了五组辩证操作，利用了辩证对话方法中的概念和工具（WaltonWalton 和 Krabbe，对话中的承诺：人际推理的基本概念，纽约州立大学出版社，奥尔巴尼，1995 年），Hubert Marraud 的论证辩证法（Marraud，En buena lógica. Una introducción a la teoríade la argumentación，Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, 2020）和来自广泛的正式传统辩证法和对话逻辑。在剩下的三个部分中，哲学家克里斯汀·M·科斯加德、菲利普·基彻和彼得·辛格对德瓦尔的坦纳讲座的评论进行了辩证分析。