This discussion article replies to a challenge for potential perspectivism raised by Davide Fassio in this journal. Potential Perspectivism holds that what one ought to do depends on facts that are potentially accessible. Fassio argues against potential perspectivism based on cases of conjunction agglomeration failure of facts that are potentially accessible. I offer a refined account of potential perspectivism that handles cases of conjunction agglomeration failure by spelling out the notion of a potential perspective in terms of sets. This account of potential perspectivism comes to plausible verdicts about what one ought to do in a wide range of cases.

中文翻译：

---

潜在视角主义的潜在视角——回复 Fassio

这篇讨论文章回应了 Davide Fassio 在本期刊中提出的对潜在透视主义的挑战。潜在透视主义认为，一个人应该做什么取决于可能获得的事实。Fassio 反对基于可能获得的事实的联合聚集失败案例的潜在透视主义。我通过在集合方面阐明潜在视角的概念，对潜在的透视主义进行了精细的解释，以处理结合凝聚失败的情况。这种对潜在透视主义的解释得出了关于在广泛的案例中应该做什么的合理判断。