This study updates and extends prior work on institutional and individual productivity in educational psychology journals (Cognition and Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Educational Psychologist, Educational Psychology Review, Journal of Educational Psychology) from 2015 to 2021. As in previous studies, the University of Maryland, College Park, was the top-producing institution. Several universities (e.g., University of Tübingen) emerged as highly productive compared to previous time periods. Using two approaches to measure individual productivity, we found that Richard Mayer, Ulrich Trautwein, Fred Paas, Patricia Alexander, and Logan Fiorella claimed the top spots. We also identified productive early career scholars and, for some, recognized connections to productive doctoral advisors. Overall, compared to prior years, authors of educational psychology journal articles were increasingly working from non-US institutions and in larger teams (higher mean number of authors per article). A discussion of these trends and future directions for research are included.

本研究更新并扩展了教育心理学期刊（认知与教学、当代教育心理学、教育心理学家、教育心理学评论、教育心理学杂志）中关于机构和个人生产力的先前工作。) 从 2015 年到 2021 年。与之前的研究一样，马里兰大学帕克分校是产量最高的机构。与以前的时期相比，几所大学（例如，蒂宾根大学）的生产力越来越高。使用两种方法来衡量个人生产力，我们发现 Richard Mayer、Ulrich Trautwein、Fred Paas、Patricia Alexander 和 Logan Fiorella 位居榜首。我们还确定了富有成效的早期职业学者，并且对于一些人来说，与富有成效的博士顾问建立了公认的联系。总体而言，与前几年相比，教育心理学期刊文章的作者越来越多地在非美国机构和更大的团队中工作（每篇文章的平均作者人数更高）。包括对这些趋势和未来研究方向的讨论。