This paper presents the results of an interdisciplinary study of Lydian pottery excavated at Daskyleion between 1988 and 2002. Before becoming the satrapal centre of Hellespontine Phrygia in the Achaemenid period, to judge by the historical and archaeological evidence, Daskyleion had close interrelations with the Lydian kingdom. Previous stylistic and macroscopic fabric studies of Lydian pottery from Daskyleion have shown that as well as items produced in the Lydian capital of Sardis, ceramics may also have been imported from other production centres in the region of Greater Lydia (Gürtekin-Demir 2002). New chemical analysis by neutron activation (NAA) of 31 samples from Daskyleion presented here confirms this suggestion. We determined four chemical provenance groups of Lydian pottery, each of them defined by an element pattern which is distinct from the pottery made in Sardis. Although these four provenance groups cannot be located at present due to the lack of reference data from potential Lydian-style ceramic production centres in Anatolia, they prove that other production centres existed outside Sardis. Daskyleion may have been one of those.

本文介绍了对 1988 年至 2002 年间在 Daskyleion 出土的吕底亚陶器的跨学科研究结果。在成为阿契美尼德时期赫勒斯滂弗里吉亚的总督中心之前，从历史和考古证据来看，Daskyleion 与吕底亚王国有着密切的关系. 先前对 Daskyleion 吕底亚陶器的风格和宏观织物研究表明，除了在萨迪斯的吕底亚首府生产的物品外，陶瓷也可能从大吕底亚地区的其他生产中心进口（Gürtekin-Demir 2002）。通过中子活化 (NAA) 对来自 Daskyleion 的 31 个样品进行的新化学分析证实了这一建议。我们确定了吕底亚陶器的四个化学来源组，它们中的每一个都由一种元素图案定义，这种图案不同于撒狄的陶器。尽管由于缺乏来自安纳托利亚潜在的吕底亚式陶瓷生产中心的参考数据，目前无法定位这四个来源组，但它们证明了在萨迪斯之外存在其他生产中心。Daskyleion 可能就是其中之一。