当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of different extractive distillation processes for chloroform/n-hexane separation: design and control
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-19 , DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7213
Zeng Xingyan 1 , Yu Jianting 2 , Lin Zhu 1 , Lv Liping 3 , Zhou Qian 1 , Zhang Chunhua 1
Affiliation  

When extracting total glycosides from Panax notoginseng, a waste liquid containing chloroform and n-hexane will be produced. These waste liquids are not separated and recycled in time, which will not only waste resources but also cause environmental pollution. Chloroform and n-hexane form an azeotrope which cannot be separated by ordinary distillation methods. This study proposes three extractive distillation processes to separate the chloroform/n-hexane azeotrope: conventional extractive distillation (ED), side-stream extractive distillation (SSED) and extractive dividing wall column (EDWC). The total annual cost (TAC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the three options were compared, and the optimal process was selected. Furthermore, this research developed dynamic control of the optimal process.

中文翻译:

氯仿/正己烷分离不同萃取精馏工艺的比较:设计与控制

从三七中提取总苷时,会产生含有氯仿和正己烷的废液。这些废液不及时分离回收,不仅会浪费资源,还会造成环境污染。氯仿和正己烷形成共沸物,不能用普通蒸馏方法分离。本研究提出了三种萃取蒸馏工艺来分离氯仿/正己烷共沸物:常规萃取蒸馏(ED)、侧流萃取蒸馏(SSED)和萃取间壁塔(EDWC)。年总成本 (TAC) 和二氧化碳 (CO 2) 比较了三种方案的排放量,选择了最优工艺。此外,本研究开发了优化过程的动态控制。
更新日期:2022-08-19
down
wechat
bug