Journal of Clinical Oncology ( IF 42.1 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-12 , DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02815 Meletios A Dimopoulos 1 , Dominik Dytfeld 2 , Sebastian Grosicki 3 , Philippe Moreau 4 , Naoki Takezako 5 , Mitsuo Hori 6 , Xavier Leleu 7 , Richard LeBlanc 8 , Kenshi Suzuki 9 , Marc S Raab 10 , Paul G Richardson 11 , Mihaela Popa McKiver 12 , Ying-Ming Jou 12 , David Yao 12 , Prianka Das 12 , Jesús San-Miguel 13
In the phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02654132), elotuzumab combined with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (EPd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) previously treated with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results.
METHODSPatients with RRMM who had received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, with disease refractory to last therapy and either refractory or relapsed and refractory to lenalidomide and a PI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EPd or Pd. The primary end point was PFS per investigator assessment. ORR and OS were secondary end points planned to be tested hierarchically.
RESULTSA total of 117 patients were randomly assigned to EPd (n = 60) and Pd (n = 57). Among treated patients (EPd 60, Pd 55), there were 37 (61.7%) deaths in the EPd group and 41 (74.5%) in the Pd group, most commonly because of disease progression (EPd 41.7%, Pd 49.1%). Median (95% CI) OS was significantly improved with EPd (29.8 [22.9 to 45.7] months) versus Pd (17.4 [13.8 to 27.7] months), with a hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.93; P = .0217). OS benefit with EPd was observed in most patient subgroups. The safety profile of EPd was consistent with prior reports with no new safety signals detected.
CONCLUSIONEPd demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS versus Pd in patients with RRMM previously treated with lenalidomide and a PI who had disease refractory to last therapy. In this setting, ELOQUENT-3 is the first randomized study of a triplet regimen incorporating a monoclonal antibody and Pd to improve both PFS and OS significantly.
中文翻译:
埃罗妥珠单抗加泊马度胺和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤:来自随机 II 期 ELOQUENT-3 试验的最终总体生存分析
目的
在 II 期 ELOQUENT-3 试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02654132)中,与泊马度胺/地塞米松 (Pd) 相比,elotuzumab 联合泊马度胺/地塞米松 (EPd) 显着改善了复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的无进展生存期 (PFS) (RRMM) 以前用来那度胺和蛋白酶体抑制剂 (PI) 治疗过。在这里,我们展示了最终的总体生存 (OS) 结果。
方法既往接受过 ≥ 2 线治疗的 RRMM 患者,其疾病对上次治疗难治,且对来那度胺和 PI 难治或复发且难治,被随机分配 (1:1) 接受 EPd 或 Pd。主要终点是研究者评估的 PFS。ORR 和 OS 是计划分层测试的次要终点。
结果共有 117 名患者被随机分配到 EPd(n = 60)和 Pd(n = 57)。在接受治疗的患者中(EPd 60,Pd 55),EPd 组有 37 例(61.7%)死亡,Pd 组有 41 例(74.5%)死亡,最常见的原因是疾病进展(EPd 41.7%,Pd 49.1%)。EPd(29.8 [22.9 至 45.7] 个月)与 Pd(17.4 [13.8 至 27.7] 个月)相比,中位(95% CI)OS 显着改善,风险比为 0.59(95% CI,0.37 至 0.93;P = .0217)。在大多数患者亚组中观察到 EPd 的 OS 获益。EPd 的安全性与之前的报告一致,没有检测到新的安全信号。
结论EPd 表明,在先前接受过来那度胺治疗的 RRMM 患者中,OS 与 Pd 相比具有统计学意义的显着改善,而 PI 的疾病对上次治疗难以治愈。在这种情况下,ELOQUENT-3 是第一个结合单克隆抗体和 Pd 的三联疗法显着改善 PFS 和 OS 的随机研究。