当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clin. Infect. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
SARS-CoV-2 testing and detection during peripartum hospitalizations among a multi-center cohort of pregnant persons, March 2020–February 2021
Clinical Infectious Diseases ( IF 8.2 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-12 , DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac657
Miranda J Delahoy 1, 2 , Flor Munoz 3 , De-Kun Li 4 , Carmen Sofia Arriola 1 , Nanette Lee Bond 3 , Michael Daugherty 1 , Jeannette Ferber 4 , Nickolas Ferguson 5 , Louise Hadden 5 , Jillian T Henderson 6 , Stephanie A Irving 6 , Mary Juergens 5 , Venkatesh Kancharla 3 , Mara Greenberg 7 , Roxana Odouli 4 , Gabriella Newes-Adeyi 5 , Erin G Nicholson 3 , Lawrence Reichle 5 , Momodou Sanyang 3 , Margaret Snead 1 , Fatimah S Dawood 1 , Allison L Naleway 6
Affiliation  

Background Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infections during peripartum hospitalizations is important to guide care, implement prevention measures, and understand infection burden. Methods This cross-sectional analysis used electronic health record data from hospitalizations during which pregnancies ended (peripartum hospitalizations) among a cohort of pregnant persons at 3 U.S. integrated healthcare networks (Sites 1–3). Maternal demographic, medical encounter, SARS-CoV-2 testing, and pregnancy and neonatal outcome information was extracted for persons with estimated delivery and pregnancy end dates during March 2020–February 2021 and ≥1 prenatal care record. Site-stratified multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with testing and compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among persons tested. Results Among 17,858 pregnant persons, 10,863 (60.8%) had peripartum SARS-CoV-2 testing; 222/10,683 (2.0%) had positive results. Testing prevalence varied by site and was lower during March–May 2020. Factors associated with higher peripartum SARS-CoV-2 testing odds were Asian race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.03–1.79; referent: White) (Site 1), Hispanic or Latina ethnicity (aOR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.08–1.64) (Site 2), peripartum Medicaid coverage (aOR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06–1.66) (Site 1), and preterm hospitalization (aOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.19–2.39 [Site 1]; aOR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.03–1.88 [Site 2]). Conclusions Findings highlight potential disparities in SARS-CoV-2 peripartum testing by demographic and pregnancy characteristics. Testing practice variations should be considered when interpreting studies relying on convenience samples of pregnant persons testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Efforts to address testing differences between groups could improve equitable testing practices and care for pregnant persons with SARS-CoV-2 infections.

中文翻译:

2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 2 月多中心孕妇队列围产期住院期间的 SARS-CoV-2 检测和检测

背景 在围产期住院期间识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染对于指导护理、实施预防措施和了解感染负担很重要。方 为预计分娩和妊娠结束日期在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 2 月期间且有≥1 项产前检查记录的人提取了孕产妇人口统计、医疗遭遇、SARS-CoV-2 检测以及妊娠和新生儿结局信息。站点分层多变量逻辑回归用于确定与测试相关的因素,并比较测试人员的妊娠和新生儿结果。结果 在 17 个中,858 名孕妇中有 10,863 人 (60.8%) 进行了围产期 SARS-CoV-2 检测;222/10,683 (2.0%) 有积极的结果。检测流行率因地点而异,在 2020 年 3 月至 5 月期间较低。与较高的围产期 SARS-CoV-2 检测几率相关的因素是亚洲种族(调整后的优势比 [aOR]:1.36;95% CI:1.03-1.79;参考对象:白人)(站点 1)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔(aOR:1.33;95% CI:1.08–1.64)(站点 2)、围产期医疗补助覆盖率(aOR:1.33;95% CI:1.06–1.66)(站点 1)和早产住院(aOR:1.69;95% CI:1.19–2.39 [站点 1];aOR:1.39;95% CI:1.03–1.88 [站点 2])。结论 研究结果强调了 SARS-CoV-2 围产期检测在人口统计学和妊娠特征方面的潜在差异。在解释依赖 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的孕妇的便利样本的研究时,应考虑检测实践的差异。努力解决不同群体之间的检测差异可以改善对感染 SARS-CoV-2 的孕妇的公平检测做法和护理。
更新日期:2022-08-12
down
wechat
bug