当前位置: X-MOL 学术Br. J. Anaesth. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of apnoeic oxygen techniques in term pregnant subjects: a computational modelling study
British Journal of Anaesthesia ( IF 9.1 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-11 , DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.021
Reena Ellis 1 , Marianna Laviola 2 , Daniel Stolady 3 , Rebecca L Valentine 2 , Arani Pillai 1 , Jonathan G Hardman 4
Affiliation  

Background

Hypoxaemia during general anaesthesia can cause harm. Apnoeic oxygenation extends safe apnoea time, reducing risk during airway management. We hypothesised that low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) would extend safe apnoea time similarly to high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO), whilst allowing face-mask preoxygenation and rescue.

Methods

A high-fidelity, computational, physiological model was used to examine the progression of hypoxaemia during apnoea in virtual models of pregnant women in and out of labour, with BMI of 24–50 kg m−2. Subjects were preoxygenated with oxygen 100% to reach end-tidal oxygen fraction (FE'O2) of 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90%. When apnoea started, HFNO or LFNO was commenced. To simulate varying degrees of effectiveness of LFNO, periglottic oxygen fraction (FgO2) of 21%, 60%, or 100% was configured. HFNO provided FgO2 100% and oscillating positive pharyngeal pressure.

Results

Application of LFNO (FgO2 100%) after optimal preoxygenation (FE'O2 90%) resulted in similar or longer safe apnoea times than HFNO FE'O2 80% in all subjects in labour. For BMI of 24, the time to reach SaO2 90% with LFNO was 25.4 min (FE'O2 90%/FgO2 100%) vs 25.4 min with HFNO (FE'O2 80%). For BMI of 50, the time was 9.9 min with LFNO (FE'O2 90%/FgO2 100%) vs 4.3 min with HFNO (FE'O2 80%). A similar finding was seen in subjects with BMI ≥40 kg m−2 not in labour.

Conclusions

There is likely to be clinical benefit to using LFNO, given that LFNO and HFNO extend safe apnoea time similarly, particularly when BMI ≥40 kg m−2. Additional benefits to LFNO include the facilitation of rescue face-mask ventilation and ability to monitor FE'O2 during preoxygenation.



中文翻译:

足月妊娠受试者窒息吸氧技术的比较:计算模型研究

背景

全身麻醉期间的低氧血症会造成伤害。呼吸暂停氧合可延长安全呼吸暂停时间,降低气道管理期间的风险。我们假设低流量鼻氧合 (LFNO) 会像高流量鼻氧合 (HFNO) 一样延长安全呼吸暂停时间,同时允许面罩预氧合和抢救。

方法

在 BMI 为 24-50 kg m -2的孕妇虚拟模型中,使用高保真计算生理模型检查呼吸暂停期间低氧血症的进展。受试者使用 100% 的氧气进行预充氧,以达到60%、70%、80% 或 90%的潮气末氧分数 (FE'O 2 )。当呼吸暂停开始时,HFNO 或 LFNO 开始。为了模拟 LFNO 的不同程度的有效性,配置了 21%、60% 或 100%的声门周氧分数 (FgO 2 )。HFNO 提供 100% 的 FgO 2和振荡的咽正压。

结果

在最佳预氧合 (FE'O 2 90%) 后应用 LFNO (FgO 2 100% ) 导致所有分娩对象的安全呼吸暂停时间与 HFNO FE'O 2 80% 相似或更长。对于 24 的 BMI,使用 LFNO 时达到SaO 2 90% 的时间为 25.4 分钟(FE'O 2 90%/FgO 2 100%) ,而使用HFNO时为25.4 分钟(FE'O 2 80%)。对于 50 的 BMI,使用 LFNO (FE'O 2 90%/FgO 2 100%)的时间为 9.9 分钟,而使用 HFNO (FE'O 2 80%) 的时间4.3 分钟。在 BMI ≥ 40 kg m -2未分娩的受试者中也观察到类似的发现。

结论

考虑到 LFNO 和 HFNO 延长安全呼吸暂停时间的方式相似,特别是当 BMI ≥ 40 kg m -2时,使用 LFNO 可能具有临床益处。LFNO 的其他好处包括促进救援面罩通气和在预充氧期间监测 FE'O 2的能力。

更新日期:2022-08-11
down
wechat
bug