当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Eur. Respir. J.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reply: The new ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some extant limitations
European Respiratory Journal ( IF 16.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-10 , DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01112-2022 Sanja Stanojevic 1 , David A Kaminsky 2 , Martin Miller 3 , Bruce Thompson 4
中文翻译:
回复: ERS/ATS 肺功能检查新标准解读:存在一些局限性
更新日期:2022-08-10
European Respiratory Journal ( IF 16.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-10 , DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01112-2022 Sanja Stanojevic 1 , David A Kaminsky 2 , Martin Miller 3 , Bruce Thompson 4
Affiliation
We would like to thank J.A. Neder for his thoughtful correspondence and critical review of the updated ERS/ATS technical statement on pulmonary function test interpretation [1]. As the updated technical document focuses on physiological interpretation of pulmonary function tests, we welcome the discussion on how to incorporate these updated standards into clinical practice.
中文翻译:
回复: ERS/ATS 肺功能检查新标准解读:存在一些局限性
我们要感谢 JA Neder 的深思熟虑的通信和对更新的 ERS/ATS 肺功能测试解释技术声明的批判性审查 [1]。由于更新的技术文件侧重于肺功能测试的生理解释,我们欢迎讨论如何将这些更新的标准纳入临床实践。