Purpose

This evidence and gap map collates evidence reporting on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to prevent, disclose, respond to, or treat child maltreatment occurring in institutional settings.

Methods

A comprehensive and systematic literature search identified primary studies and systematic reviews meeting the review’s eligibility criteria. Literature screening, data extraction and critical appraisals were undertaken independently by multiple reviewers. Data extracted and reported from the included studies included information about the institutional setting, target population, type of maltreatment, intervention type and outcomes.

Results

Seventy-three studies were identified, including 11 systematic reviews and 62 primary studies. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was low to moderate. Most evaluated curriculum-based interventions delivered in educational settings, primarily aimed at preventing sexual abuse. Fewer studies examined other institutional settings or intervention types.

Conclusions

This review highlights a need for high-quality studies evaluating a more diverse range of interventions across more varied institutional contexts.

中文翻译：

---

解决机构虐待儿童的干预措施：证据和差距图

目的

该证据和差距图整理了有关旨在预防、披露、应对或治疗机构环境中发生的虐待儿童的干预措施有效性的证据报告。

方法

全面和系统的文献检索确定了符合评价资格标准的主要研究和系统评价。文献筛选、数据提取和批判性评价由多名评审员独立进行。从纳入研究中提取和报告的数据包括有关机构设置、目标人群、虐待类型、干预类型和结果的信息。

结果

确定了 73 项研究，包括 11 项系统评价和 62 项初步研究。总体而言，研究的方法学质量从低到中等。大多数评估的基于课程的干预措施是在教育环境中提供的，主要旨在防止性虐待。很少有研究检查其他机构设置或干预类型。

结论

这篇综述强调了对高质量研究的需求，该研究评估了更多样化的机构环境中更多样化的干预措施。