Tolerance of minority beliefs and practices is typically considered a critical ingredient for an equal and diverse society. Psychologically, people can use both intuitive and deliberative cognitive sources to make tolerance judgments. Following dual-process theories, this research uses survey experiments to manipulate intuitive versus deliberative thinking to examine whether deliberative thinking increases tolerance of minority practices. Across three studies using nationally representative samples of Dutch majority members (N = 1,811), we find that deliberative thinking increases tolerance, regardless of whether people deliberate over pragmatic or principled reasons for accepting contested minority practices and social changes. These findings are similar across a range of minority practices and robust across gender, age, educational level, and political orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

深思熟虑增加了对少数群体做法的容忍度：测试容忍度的双过程模型。

对少数民族信仰和做法的宽容通常被认为是平等和多元化社会的关键要素。在心理上，人们可以使用直觉和深思熟虑的认知来源来做出容忍度判断。遵循双过程理论，本研究使用调查实验来操纵直觉思维与审慎思维，以检验审慎思维是否会增加对少数民族做法的容忍度。在使用具有全国代表性的荷兰多数成员 (N = 1,811) 样本的三项研究中，我们发现，无论人们是否考虑过务实或原则性的理由来接受有争议的少数群体做法和社会变革，协商思维都会增加容忍度。这些发现在一系列少数民族实践中是相似的，并且在性别、年龄、教育水平、和政治取向。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。