Programmatic secularism aims to secure public reason from rival rationalities, notably those from religious experience and education. The gathering of knowledge in clinical ethics into a concrete array of consensus claims and consensus-derived principles are thought by Janet Malek to secure such public reason—an essential tool for clinical ethics consultants to execute their professional role. The author compares this gathering of knowledge to an understanding of what technology is. Accordingly, the following interrogates Malek’s programmatic secularism, which is a moral technique (technology) that not only homogenizes moral dialogue but also dehumanizes persons as it tyrannizes the creative freedom for moral conversation and genuine encounter. Thus, the reader is encouraged to dissent of such a vision for delimiting the role of clinical ethics consultants according to the rule and measure of technology, the ontology of our age.

中文翻译：

---

马雷克的程序化世俗主义？异议

程序化世俗主义旨在确保公共理性免受竞争理性的影响，尤其是来自宗教经验和教育的理性。Janet Malek 认为将临床伦理学知识收集到一系列具体的共识主张和共识衍生原则中，以确保这种公共理性——临床伦理顾问履行其专业职责的重要工具。作者将这种知识的收集比作对什么是技术的理解。因此，下面将质疑马雷克的程序化世俗主义，这是一种道德技术（技术），它不仅使道德对话同质化，而且在压制道德对话和真正相遇的创造自由时也使人非人化。因此，