Though recent advances in research on social class have contributed to our wider understanding of college students’ academic and social outcomes, classism in academe remains underexplored across cultures, primarily due to a lack of instruments. The present study discussed the validation of the existing classism measure to assess Korean college students’ experiences with classism in academe (Korean version of Classism Experiences Questionnaire-Academe; K-CEQ-A). In a sample of 271 Korean college students (52.4% female; M_age = 23.5), exploratory factor analysis indicated three factors of the K-CEQ-A. Confirmatory factor analysis involving a sample of 220 Korean college students (54.1% female; M_age = 23.5) indicated a bifactor model of the K-CEQ-A. Findings also provided evidence for adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alphas coefficients between .74 and .86) and convergent validity of K-CEQ-A with subjective social class, mental health, belief in a just world, and personal relative deprivation. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

尽管社会阶级研究的最新进展有助于我们更广泛地了解大学生的学业和社会成果，但学术界的阶级主义在不同文化中仍未得到充分探索，这主要是由于缺乏工具。本研究讨论了现有的阶级主义测量方法的有效性，以评估韩国大学生在学术上的阶级主义经历（韩国版的阶级主义体验问卷-学院；K-CEQ-A）。在 271 名韩国大学生（52.4% 女性；M_年龄 = 23.5）的样本中，探索性因素分析表明 K-CEQ-A 的三个因素。涉及 220 名韩国大学生（54.1% 女性；M_{年龄）样本的验证性因素分析} = 23.5) 表示 K-CEQ-A 的双因子模型。研究结果还提供了足够的内部一致性（Cronbach alphas 系数介于 0.74 和 0.86 之间）和 K-CEQ-A 与主观社会阶层、心理健康、公正世界信念和个人相对剥夺的收敛有效性的证据。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。