当前位置: X-MOL 学术BJU Int. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Cost−utility analysis of shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic stone treatment in adults
BJU International ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-29 , DOI: 10.1111/bju.15862
Mary M Kilonzo 1 , Ranan Dasgupta 2 , Ruth Thomas 3 , Lorna Aucott 4 , Sara MacLennan 5 , Thomas Boon L Lam 6 , Ken Anson 7 , Sarah Cameron 3 , Kath Starr 8 , Neil Burgess 9 , Francis Xavier Keeley 10 , Charles T Clark 11 , James N'Dow 6 , Graeme MacLennan 3 , Sam McClinton 6
Affiliation  

To assess the cost-effectiveness, resource use implications, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY of care pathways starting with either extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or with ureteroscopic retrieval (ureteroscopy [URS]) for the management of ureteric stones.

中文翻译:

成人冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜结石治疗的成本效用分析

评估以体外冲击波碎石术 (SWL) 或输尿管镜取回术(输尿管镜检查 [URS])开始的护理途径的成本效益、资源使用影响、质量调整生命年 (QALY) 和每 QALY 成本,用于管理输尿管结石。
更新日期:2022-07-29
down
wechat
bug