Recent discussions of humanitarian intervention in international relations (IR) have often focused on the evolution of norms, and the development and contestation of the responsibility to protect (R2P) framework. While beneficial in tracing this process, most of these studies tend not to incorporate an analysis of colonialism, race, sexuality, or gender. While postcolonial studies of humanitarian intervention have done well to illustrate the relationship between humanitarian intervention and colonial violence, they still tend to neglect the study of sexuality and gender. Exploring how the sexualized, gendered, and racialized dimensions of colonialism can be incorporated into the study of humanitarian intervention, this paper proposes a queer approach. After exploring the valuable contributions of feminist scholarship, it suggests that the queer approaches of Nicola Pratt (“The Queen Boat Case in Egypt: Sexuality, National Security and State Sovereignty,” Review of International Studies 33, no. 1 [2007]: 129–44), Cynthia Weber (Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. New York, Oxford University Press, 2016), and Laura Shepherd and Laura Sjoberg (“Trans- Bodies in/of War(s): Cisprivilege and Contemporary Security Strategy,” Feminist Review 101, no. 1 [2012]: 5–23) offer some distinct contributions that build upon feminist insights. Applying these to the 2015 House of Commons debate on airstrikes against ISIL, the paper suggests that queer IR can invigorate the study of humanitarian intervention with a framework that unpacks the simultaneously gendered, sexual, and racial dimensions of colonial violence.

中文翻译：

---

性、性别和人道主义干预的殖民暴力

最近关于国际关系 (IR) 中人道主义干预的讨论通常集中在规范的演变以及保护责任 (R2P) 框架的发展和争论上。虽然有利于追踪这一过程，但这些研究中的大多数倾向于不纳入对殖民主义、种族、性或性别的分析。虽然人道主义干预的后殖民研究很好地说明了人道主义干预与殖民暴力之间的关系，但他们仍然倾向于忽视对性和性别的研究。探索如何将殖民主义的性化、性别化和种族化维度纳入人道主义干预研究，本文提出了一种酷儿方法。在探索了女权主义学术的宝贵贡献之后，它表明 Nicola Pratt 的酷儿方法（“The Queen Boat Case in Egypt: Sexuality, National Security and State Sovereignty,” Review of International Studies 33, no. 1 [2007]: 129–44），Cynthia Weber（Queer International关系：主权、性和知识意志。纽约，牛津大学出版社，2016 年），以及 Laura Shepherd 和 Laura Sjoberg（“战争中/的跨体：独联体特权和当代安全战略”，女权主义评论 101 , no. 1 [2012]: 5-23) 提供了一些基于女权主义见解的独特贡献。将这些应用到 2015 年下议院关于空袭伊黎伊斯兰国的辩论中，该论文表明，酷儿国际关系可以通过一个解开殖民暴力同时存在的性别、性和种族维度的框架来激发人道主义干预的研究。