The topic of standing to blame has recently received a lot of attention. Until now, however, it has focused mainly on the blamer's perspective, investigating what it means to say of blamers that they lose standing to blame and why it is that they lose this standing under specified conditions. The present paper focuses on the perspective of the blamees and tries to explain why they are allowed to disregard standingless, more specifically hypocritical, blame. According to the solution proposed by the paper, while hypocritical blamers present themselves as caring about justice or about the moral or material good of the blamees—and they themselves half-believe this presentation—their real motivation in blaming is less respectable. It is this problematic motivation that explains why blamees are permitted to disregard hypocritical blame. Ill-motivated blame is often unreliable, and readiness to even consider it often involves a compromise on the self-respect of the blamees.

中文翻译：

---

为什么不理会虚伪的指责是恰当的

归咎于责任的话题最近受到了很多关注。然而，到目前为止，它主要关注指责者的观点，研究指责者说他们失去了指责的意义，以及为什么他们在特定条件下失去了这种指责。本文着重于受责备者的观点，并试图解释为什么他们可以无视毫无根据的、更具体地说是虚伪的责备。根据该论文提出的解决方案，虽然虚伪的指责者表现出关心正义或关心指责者的道德或物质利益——他们自己半信半疑——但他们指责的真正动机并不那么令人尊敬。正是这种有问题的动机解释了为什么允许责备者无视虚伪的责备。