当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Transp. Geogr. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Using modality styles to understand cycling dissonance: The role of the street-scale environment in commuters' travel mode choice
Journal of Transport Geography ( IF 5.899 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-16 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103406
Lihong Zhang , Yan Liu , Scott N. Lieske , Jonathan Corcoran

Commuters who live spatially proximate to their workplaces have the greatest potential to commute by cycling. Employing the concept of cycling dissonance—the mismatch of individuals who can commute by cycling given a cyclable distance between home and the workplace but travel by other modes—we examine the role of the street-scale environment in commuters' travel mode choice via a lens of modality styles. Drawing on the household travel survey data for Greater Brisbane, Australia and employing latent class choice modelling, two modality styles are unveiled: (1) car oriented; and (2) multimodal but walking averse. Commuters falling within the first modality style are typically middle-aged adults from households that own motor vehicles. Commuters belonging to the second modality style are younger, less likely to own a car, relatively inelastic to travel time, and less sensitive to street-scale environment settings. While commuters in the first modality style predominantly use cars to commute, their propensity for cycling-to-work would likely be markedly higher if the street-scale environment of their route to work could include cycleways and is relatively flat. Those belonging to the first modality style have a higher potential to shift mode from car to cycling given their likely response to shifts in the street-scale environment. By mapping the residential locations of the two modality style groups across the case study context, we spatially delineated locales where cycling dissonance could be reduced by improving the street-scale environment, which has the capacity to inform place-based strategies in prioritising cycling-supportive investment.



中文翻译:

使用形态风格来理解骑行失调:街道尺度环境在通勤者出行方式选择中的作用

居住在工作场所附近的通勤者最有可能骑自行车通勤。采用骑车不和谐的概念——考虑到家庭和工作场所之间的可骑自行车距离,可以骑自行车上下班但以其他方式出行的人的不匹配——我们通过交通方式风格的视角来研究街道规模环境在通勤者出行方式选择中的作用。借鉴澳大利亚大布里斯班的家庭旅行调查数据并采用潜在的阶级选择模型,揭示了两种模式风格:(1)以汽车为导向;(2) 多式联运但厌恶步行。属于第一种交通方式的通勤者通常是来自拥有机动车辆的家庭的中年成年人。属于第二种方式的通勤者更年轻,拥有汽车的可能性较小,对旅行时间相对缺乏弹性,对街道规模的环境设置不太敏感。虽然第一种交通方式的通勤者主要使用汽车通勤,如果他们上班路线的街道规模环境可以包括自行车道并且相对平坦,他们骑自行车上班的倾向可能会明显更高。那些属于第一种模式风格的人更有可能将模式从汽车转变为骑自行车,因为他们可能会对街道规模环境的变化做出反应。通过在案例研究背景下绘制两种模式风格组的居住位置,我们在空间上描绘了可以通过改善街道规模环境来减少骑车不和谐的地方,这有能力为基于地点的策略提供优先考虑骑自行车支持的信息投资。那些属于第一种模式风格的人更有可能将模式从汽车转变为骑自行车,因为他们可能会对街道规模环境的变化做出反应。通过在案例研究背景下绘制两种模式风格组的居住位置,我们在空间上描绘了可以通过改善街道规模环境来减少骑车不和谐的地方,这有能力为基于地点的策略提供优先考虑骑自行车支持的信息投资。那些属于第一种模式风格的人更有可能将模式从汽车转变为骑自行车,因为他们可能会对街道规模环境的变化做出反应。通过在案例研究背景下绘制两种模式风格组的居住位置,我们在空间上描绘了可以通过改善街道规模环境来减少骑车不和谐的地方,这有能力为基于地点的策略提供优先考虑骑自行车支持的信息投资。

更新日期:2022-07-17
down
wechat
bug