Urban pluvial flooding (UPF) resulting from localized, intense, rainfall-generated ponding and overland flow causes a range of socio-environmental impacts. UPF is driven by a complex set of interconnected factors, including physical, historical, social, cultural, institutional, and economic conditions. Its impacts are increasing due to both biophysical change (e.g., global warming) and the interactions between the human and physical dimensions of the urban environment (e.g., land-use change). Notwithstanding its complexity and the rather low level of attention it has received in both research and practice, UPF is an issue that needs to be tackled from a comprehensive perspective. Different integrated approaches such as citizen science and socio-hydrology have tried to address UPF by coupling humans and environmental systems, reflecting the possible outcomes from the interaction between disciplines—albeit not without limitations. This paper presents findings on a review of current integrated community-based approaches to UPF research and discusses how scholars have approached this problem and its management. The limitations of these approaches to fully capture the multi-dimensional nature of UPF are explored in detail, and research gaps are identified. Finally, the paper provides suggestions for future research based on a transdisciplinary, transformative citizen science approach.

由局部、强烈、降雨产生的积水和地表水流引起的城市雨洪 (UPF) 会造成一系列社会环境影响。UPF 由一系列复杂的相互关联的因素驱动，包括物理、历史、社会、文化、制度和经济条件。由于生物物理变化（例如全球变暖）以及城市环境的人类和物理维度之间的相互作用（例如土地利用变化），其影响正在增加。尽管UPF复杂且在研究和实践中受到的关注程度较低，但UPF是一个需要综合考虑的问题。公民科学和社会水文学等不同的综合方法试图通过耦合人类和环境系统来解决 UPF，反映学科之间相互作用的可能结果——尽管并非没有限制。本文介绍了对当前基于社区的综合方法进行 UPF 研究的回顾的结果，并讨论了学者们如何处理这个问题及其管理。详细探讨了这些方法在充分捕捉 UPF 的多维性质方面的局限性，并确定了研究差距。最后，本文为基于跨学科、变革性公民科学方法的未来研究提供了建议。详细探讨了这些方法在充分捕捉 UPF 的多维性质方面的局限性，并确定了研究差距。最后，本文为基于跨学科、变革性公民科学方法的未来研究提供了建议。详细探讨了这些方法在充分捕捉 UPF 的多维性质方面的局限性，并确定了研究差距。最后，本文为基于跨学科、变革性公民科学方法的未来研究提供了建议。