Cities around the world make efforts to reduce car use and its negative consequences but even in cycling cities, mobility behaviour is still dominated by car use. This paper examines the effect of life events, changed resources and attitude-behaviour incongruency on changes in people's mobility style. The paper is based on a longitudinal survey including people who participated 2–3 times within a 2.5-year period. Applying latent transition analysis based on participants' mobility attitudes and behaviour, we identified 5 distinct mobility classes: one functional and one enthusiastic car user class; one car-prone and one car-aversive cycling class and a public transport class. Free-floating car sharing subscription had an effect on initial class membership but not on transition probability. However, shifts were significantly related to age and gender, changes in income and place of residence. Yet, most effects disappeared when car ownership was included in the latent transition model. Once people end up in car-centred mobility styles, a voluntary transition back seems difficult to achieve.

世界各地的城市都在努力减少汽车使用及其负面后果，但即使在骑自行车的城市，出行行为仍然以汽车使用为主。本文考察了生活事件、资源变化和态度-行为不一致对人们出行方式变化的影响。该论文基于一项纵向调查，包括在 2.5 年内参与 2-3 次的人。根据参与者的移动态度和行为应用潜在转换分析，我们确定了 5 个不同的移动类别：一个功能性和一个热情的汽车用户类别；一门易开车和一门厌恶汽车的自行车课和一门公共交通课。自由浮动汽车共享订阅对初始班级成员有影响，但对过渡概率没有影响。然而，变化与年龄和性别、收入变化和居住地有很大关系。然而，当汽车所有权被纳入潜在过渡模型时，大多数影响都消失了。一旦人们最终采用以汽车为中心的出行方式，似乎很难实现自愿过渡。