当前位置: X-MOL 学术Hum. Reprod. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
P-730 Transparency and Trustworthiness in Randomised Controlled Trials in In Vitro Fertilisation: An Analysis of Published Literature
Human Reproduction ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-30 , DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.677
Y Bai 1
Affiliation  

Study question What is the transparency and trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in the past decade? Summary answer Quality of IVF-research has improved in the last decade. Further progress can be made by prospective RCT-registration, raw data accessibility and better outlined recruitment timelines. What is known already Transparency and trustworthiness are fundamental features in science, and especially in RCTs as these studies provide evidence that guides clinical practice. The number of published RCTs is increasing. The differing quality of the RCTs, however, remains a challenge. A recent study analysing the transparency and reproducibility of RCTs published in high impact journals from 2013 to 2018 has identified trial registration, protocol availability, data accessibility as avenues of improvement (Kemper, 2020). Ongoing optimisation of routine research practices will increase faith in the generated evidence and maximise its potential benefits to the community. Study design, size, duration We performed a meta-epidemiologic study with a two-author system. We searched for all RCTs evaluating IVF published from 01/01/2010 to 23/08/2021 inclusive. Included studies were scored on transparency and trustworthiness. The main parameters were trial registration, protocol publication, funding and Trial registration number Not applicable

中文翻译:

P-730 体外受精随机对照试验的透明度和可信度:已发表文献的分析

研究问题 过去十年中体外受精 (IVF) 随机对照试验 (RCT) 的透明度和可信度如何?摘要答案 在过去十年中,体外受精研究的质量有所提高。通过前瞻性 RCT 注册、原始数据可访问性和更好地概述招聘时间表,可以取得进一步进展。众所周知,透明度和可信赖性是科学的基本特征,尤其是在 RCT 中,因为这些研究提供了指导临床实践的证据。已发表的 RCT 数量正在增加。然而,RCTs 的不同质量仍然是一个挑战。最近的一项研究分析了 2013 年至 2018 年发表在高影响力期刊上的 RCT 的透明度和可重复性,确定了试验注册、方案可用性、数据可访问性作为改进的途径(Kemper,2020)。常规研究实践的持续优化将增加对生成证据的信心,并最大限度地提高其对社区的潜在利益。研究设计、规模、持续时间 我们使用两位作者系统进行了一项元流行病学研究。我们搜索了从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 23 日(含)发布的所有评估 IVF 的 RCT。纳入的研究根据透明度和可信度进行评分。主要参数为试验注册、方案发表、资助和试验注册号 不适用 我们搜索了从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 23 日(含)发布的所有评估 IVF 的 RCT。纳入的研究根据透明度和可信度进行评分。主要参数为试验注册、方案发表、资助和试验注册号 不适用 我们搜索了从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 23 日(含)发布的所有评估 IVF 的 RCT。纳入的研究根据透明度和可信度进行评分。主要参数为试验注册、方案发表、资助和试验注册号 不适用
更新日期:2022-06-30
down
wechat
bug