Social Practice Theories (SPT) can contribute to transition studies by deepening our understanding of the key social mechanisms and dynamics underpinning transitions in everyday life and the role of agency and collective action in processes of social change. Several studies have applied SPTs with concepts from transition studies, and these connections merit attention. The review presented here shows five ways how SPT are applied in studies of system change in transition studies by (i) considering change and continuity in practice elements, niches and regimes, (ii) connecting consumption and production, (iii) going beyond user practices, (iv) mapping diffusions of innovations in daily life and (v) examining policy implications and interventions. Reflecting on this, I argue that the studies in the review show promises of using SPT for transition studies to study system change by linking consumption and production, normality and novelty, stability and instability, micro and macro change, social and technical change, and flat and hierarchal levels. Based on this and a discussion of the need for a practice paradigm of local actions in the MLP, I propose concretising the connections between SPTs, MLP and innovation systems approaches to form a Practice Innovation System framework for future research directions.

社会实践理论 (SPT) 可以通过加深我们对支撑日常生活转型的关键社会机制和动态以及代理和集体行动在社会变革过程中的作用的理解，为转型研究做出贡献。一些研究已经将 SPT 与过渡研究的概念一起应用，这些联系值得关注。这里介绍的综述展示了 SPT 如何应用于转型研究中的系统变化研究的五种方式：(i) 考虑实践要素、利基和制度的变化和连续性，(ii) 连接消费和生产，(iii) 超越用户实践, (iv) 映射日常生活中创新的扩散和 (v) 检查政策影响和干预措施。考虑到这一点，我认为，评论中的研究表明，通过将消费和生产、常态和新颖性、稳定性和不稳定性、微观和宏观变化、社会和技术变化以及扁平和等级水平联系起来，将 SPT 用于过渡研究以研究系统变化的前景。基于此以及对 MLP 中本地行动实践范式的必要性的讨论，我建议将 SPT、MLP 和创新系统方法之间的联系具体化，以形成一个未来研究方向的实践创新体系框架。