This article will consider the ways states have exercised imperialism over Antarctica, focusing on two methods: the use of administrative acts and control over scientific research and resources. The article will then compare the Outer Space Treaty and the Antarctic Treaty System around these two methods, as well as the use of military capabilities as an important aspect of imperial control, to question whether space law prohibits imperialism. The Outer Space Treaty seeks to prevent the militarisation of space, the unequal use of resources and claims of sovereignty. However, given the methods of imperialism on Antarctica and the underdevelopment of space law, this kind of imperialism may also be exercised in outer space. It will argue that while formal sovereignty claims are prevented, de facto exclusive claims are not. The establishment of permanent bases under the jurisdiction of the sender state, and the commercial opportunities presented by scientific research and the exploitation of resources create incentives for the use of the military which is also not satisfactorily regulated by international space law.

中文翻译：

---

太空法会阻止南极帝国主义在外层空间的模式吗？

本文将探讨各国对南极洲实施帝国主义的方式，重点关注两种方式：行政行为的使用和对科学研究和资源的控制。文章接下来将围绕这两种方式比较《外空条约》和《南极条约体系》，以及将军事能力作为帝国控制的一个重要方面，质疑太空法是否禁止帝国主义。《外层空间条约》旨在防止太空军事化、资源的不平等使用和主权主张。但是，鉴于帝国主义在南极的手段和空间法的不发达，这种帝国主义也可能在外层空间实施。它将争辩说，虽然正式的主权主张被阻止，但事实上排他性索赔不是。在派遣国管辖下建立永久基地，以及科学研究和资源开发带来的商业机会为使用军事提供了动力，而国际空间法也没有对其进行令人满意的监管。