Background. Wristband identification (wristband for short) is an accurate and reliable tool for patients, and it is the basic requirement of the whole medical activity of the hospital. Wearing wristband correctly can help clinical medical staff to identify patients quickly and accurately and effectively prevent medical errors and medical accidents. According to the survey, the wristband wearing rate of clinical patients is still low, mainly because the wristband is tight and improper and the medical staff education is not in place. Therefore, how to scientifically and effectively improve the wearing rate and accuracy of patients’ wristbands is an urgent nursing safety problem to be solved. Accurate identification of children is the key to ensure the safety of clinical drug use and carry out diagnosis and treatment, and wearing wristbands is the main way to identify children. Objective. A case-control study was conducted to explore the suitability and treatment compliance of an enhanced wristband wearing method compared with the traditional method. Methods. 260 hospitalized children admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were randomly divided into control group and study group. The control group used a traditional wristband, while the study group used a modified wristband. The existence of wristbands, the recognition speed of medical staff, the clarity of wristband handwriting, and the incidence of skin depression were observed in the two groups. The local skin reaction, wearing rate, incidence of wristband-related adverse events, identity compliance, and family satisfaction of patients with wristband were compared. Results. In terms of authentication compliance, the normal authentication frequency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (). The score of local skin reaction in the test group was lower than that in the control group, and the skin condition in the test group was better than that in the control group (). The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (). The proportion of wristband position, immediate recognition, and clear handwriting in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group in terms of wristband position, recognition speed, clear handwriting, and sunken skin (). There was no significant difference in the incidence of skin depression (). Parents’ ratings of satisfaction with treatment and child wearing rates were compared. After the intervention, the parents’ satisfaction with diagnosis and treatment in the observation group was 89.23%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (79.23%) (). The score of wearing rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (). Conclusion. On the basis of ensuring children’s compliance, the improved wristband wearing method can reduce the incidence of wristband shedding and ligature marks, reduce the diagnosis and treatment error rate, enhance the suitability of wearing, enhance the work efficiency of doctors and treaters, and improve the satisfaction of diagnosis and treatment.

中文翻译：

---

改进腕带佩戴方法与传统方法的适用性和治疗依从性对比研究

背景。腕带识别（简称腕带）是患者准确可靠的工具，是医院整个医疗活动的基本要求。正确佩戴腕带可以帮助临床医务人员快速、准确地识别患者，有效防止医疗失误和医疗事故。据调查，临床患者腕带佩戴率仍然较低，主要原因是腕带过紧、不当以及医护人员教育不到位。因此，如何科学有效地提高患者腕带的佩戴率和准确性是急需解决的护理安全问题。儿童准确识别是保证临床用药安全和开展诊疗的关键，客观。进行病例对照研究，探讨增强型腕带佩戴方法与传统方法相比的适用性和治疗依从性。方法。将2019年3月至2021年6月我院收治的260例住院患儿随机分为对照组和研究组。对照组使用传统腕带，而研究组使用改良腕带。观察两组患者腕带的存在情况、医护人员的识别速度、腕带字迹的清晰度、皮肤凹陷的发生情况。比较腕带患者的局部皮肤反应、佩戴率、腕带相关不良事件发生率、身份依从性及家属满意度。结果。在认证依从性方面，观察组的正常认证频率高于对照组，但差异无统计学意义（）。试验组局部皮肤反应评分低于对照组，试验组皮肤状况优于对照组（）。观察组不良事件发生率显着低于对照组（）。观察组腕带位置、立即识别、字迹清晰的比例在腕带位置、识别速度、字迹清晰、皮肤凹陷等方面均显着高于对照组（）。皮肤凹陷的发生率没有显着差异（）。比较了家长对治疗的满意度和儿童佩戴率。干预后，观察组家长对诊疗的满意度为89.23%，显着高于对照组（79.23%）。）。观察组佩戴率评分显着高于对照组（）。 结论。改进的腕带佩戴方式在保证儿童依从性的基础上，可以减少腕带脱落和结扎痕的发生，降低诊疗失误率，增强佩戴的适宜性，提高医生和治疗人员的工作效率，提高治疗效果。诊断和治疗的满意度。