Comments from the reviewers

‘ … very well-written, well-presented, and well-argued, fulfiling the aim of addressing critically an aspect of applied linguistics/SLA about which the author is clearly passionate and challenging the ubiquity, appropriateness and current relevance of the term “second language acquisition”’.

‘An essay which is at once elegant, eloquent, erudite, critical, creative, and constructive. It is topical while also grounded in a sense of the past, witty and amusing while also serious.’

中文翻译：

---

名字里有什么？为什么“SLA”不再适合目的和新兴的、更公平的替代方案

审稿人的意见

’……写得非常好，呈现得很好，论证得很好，实现了批判性地解决应用语言学/SLA的一个方面的目标，作者显然对此充满热情，并挑战了“第二”一词的普遍性、适当性和当前相关性语言习得”'。

“一篇优雅、雄辩、博学、批判、创造性和建设性的文章。它具有话题性，同时也基于过去的感觉，诙谐有趣，同时也很严肃。