The refurbishment of buildings is one of the main keys to pursue the targets of the European Green Deal, and to accomplish the European Union has applied two mechanisms among others: the European policy and the European Research and Technological Development (RTD) projects. On the one hand, the EU has published the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 with an assessment framework composed by Measurable Progress Indicators (MPI) that can be considered the main legal instrument to measure the progress of the decarbonisation together with health & wellness, social and economic related targets of the Directive 2018/844, the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). On the other hand, the RTD projects also pursue the targets of the EU but following their own assessment methodology composed by Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Considering the parallelism of these two mechanisms, the objective of this study is to analyse the applicability of the EU’s assessment framework by the RTD projects, establishing a critical point of view of the viability of the MPIs and identifying the barriers and challenges of the evaluation system proposed by the EU. Regarding the methodology, the applicability of MPIs by RTD projects has been analysed in five stages: (1) Identification and listing of the MPIs of EU Recommendation; (2) selection of European RTD projects; (3) identification of the KPIs applied by the projects; (4) study of the concordance of the MPIs of the Commission Recommendation’s assessment framework and the KPIs of the RTD projects; (5) evaluation of the barriers and challenges of the applicability of the EU’s MPIs based on the level of agreement with the projects’ KPIs. This investigation shows that although some evaluation scopes of the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 do agree with high degree with RTD projects, many MPIs present barriers related to the low reliability, the absence of standardised calculation methods, and the lack of data. Besides, the assessment framework of the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 also presents challenges to improve the evaluation of the building renovation like calibration techniques, standardised input data and the shortlisting of the MPIs to improve the effectiveness of the method. The main conclusion is that the readjustment of the assessment framework proposed in the Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 is needed. This readjustment is proposed to be done by shortlisting the MPIs and defining standardised measurement methods in order to build a common roadmap that could be followed and assessed homogenously towards the decarbonisation of the European building stock.

建筑物的翻新是实现欧洲绿色协议目标的主要关键之一，为了实现欧盟已经应用了两种机制：欧洲政策和欧洲研究与技术发展 (RTD) 项目。一方面，欧盟发布了委员会建议 (EU) 2019/786，其评估框架由可衡量的进度指标 (MPI) 组成，可被视为衡量脱碳进度以及健康和保健的主要法律工具, 指令 2018/844 的社会和经济相关目标，即建筑能效指令 (EPBD)。另一方面，RTD 项目也追求欧盟的目标，但遵循由关键绩效指标 (KPI) 组成的自己的评估方法。考虑到这两种机制的并行性，本研究的目的是分析 RTD 项目对欧盟评估框架的适用性，建立 MPI 可行性的关键观点，并确定评估系统的障碍和挑战欧盟提出的。在方法论方面，RTD 项目对 MPI 的适用性分五个阶段进行了分析：（1）欧盟建议的 MPI 的识别和列表；（2）欧洲RTD项目的选择；（三）项目应用的KPI识别；(4) 研究委员会建议评估框架的 MPI 与 RTD 项目的 KPI 的一致性；（5）根据与项目KPI的一致程度评估欧盟MPI适用性的障碍和挑战。本次调查表明，尽管欧盟委员会建议书（EU）2019/786的部分评估范围确实与RTD项目高度吻合，但许多MPI存在可靠性低、缺乏标准化计算方法、缺乏数据等障碍。此外，委员会建议 (EU) 2019/786 的评估框架也对改进建筑改造的评估提出了挑战，如校准技术、标准化输入数据和 MPI 的入围以提高方法的有效性。主要结论是，需要对建议书（EU）2019/786 中提出的评估框架进行重新调整。