The global intensification of urbanization is driving a disconnect between humans and nature. Communicating ecosystem services (ES) and disservices (EDS) to city residents offers an opportunity to help reassociate people with ecological processes of the urban forest, benefiting support for urban forest management. It has been theorized that the complexity of ES and EDS may dissuade their coverage by journalists in print media. Further, the complexity of the interrelationship of ES and EDS could represent a challenge for communication. To examine communication of ES and EDS, we conducted a literature review of newspaper articles published in two prominent newspapers in Winnipeg, Manitoba between January 2010 and May 2021. During the study period, 114 urban forestry articles mentioned ES and/or EDS. Cultural services were the most frequently discussed, followed by regulating services. Provisioning services were discussed least which may reflect their reduced importance in urban forestry discourse/management. Twenty-three articles mentioned EDS, only eight of which also mentioned ES. Only six articles referenced the related ES to the EDS, all of which were in articles focused on tree planting. Despite the complexity of many ES discussed in the articles, the interrelatedness of some ES and EDS were not well described. Counter to previous newspaper reviews, we found that ES were discussed more than EDS. However, the communication of EDS remains an important component of urban forest discourse. While navigating communication on the intersection of ES and EDS may prove challenging in print journalism, we argue restructuring EDS communication such that it is framed in ES discourse could mitigate public concerns surrounding urban forestry, while creating equitable coverage of urban forest affairs. We identify the need for further research on the impact of social media and television as alternative venues for urban forestry discourse.

全球城市化的加剧正在推动人类与自然之间的脱节。向城市居民传达生态系统服务 (ES) 和损害 (EDS) 为帮助人们重新与城市森林的生态过程联系起来提供了机会，从而有利于支持城市森林管理。理论上，ES 和 EDS 的复杂性可能会阻止印刷媒体的记者对其进行报道. 此外，ES 和 EDS 相互关系的复杂性可能对沟通构成挑战。为了检查 ES 和 EDS 的交流，我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月在曼尼托巴省温尼伯的两家著名报纸上发表的报纸文章进行了文献综述。在研究期间，114 篇城市林业文章提到了 ES 和/或 EDS。文化服务是最常被讨论的，其次是监管服务。供应服务的讨论最少，这可能反映了它们在城市林业讨论/管理中的重要性降低。23 篇文章提到了 EDS，其中只有 8 篇还提到了 ES。只有六篇文章引用了相关的ES到EDS，都是在专注于植树. 尽管文章中讨论了许多 ES 的复杂性，但一些 ES 和 EDS 的相互关联性并没有得到很好的描述。与之前的报纸评论相反，我们发现 ES 比 EDS 被讨论得更多。然而，EDS 的交流仍然是城市森林话语的重要组成部分。虽然在 ES 和 EDS 的交叉点上导航通信可能在印刷新闻中被证明具有挑战性，但我们认为重组 EDS 通信，使其在 ES 话语中框架可以减轻公众对城市林业的担忧，同时创造对城市森林事务的公平报道。我们认为需要进一步研究社交媒体和电视作为城市林业讨论的替代场所的影响。